Skip to content
Long River Review Long River Review

UConn's Literary & Arts Magazine

  • Home
  • About
    • Meet the 2026 Long River Review Staff!
    • Meet the Teams
  • Online Work
    • Blog
    • Interviews
    • Podcasts
    • Contest Winners
      • Poetry Winners
      • Fiction Winners
      • Creative Nonfiction Winners
      • Translations Winners
  • Submit
  • The Archive
    • Team Archive
      • Meet the 2025 Long River Review Staff!
    • Issues Archive
      • LRR 2024
      • LRR 2023
      • LRR 2022
      • LRR 2021
      • LRR 2020
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
Long River Review
Long River Review

UConn's Literary & Arts Magazine

Flowers in the Attic: Incest, Rape and Murder-by-Doughnut: Some Context to V.C. Andrews’ Global Hit

LRR, March 22, 2022February 8, 2025

Written by: Samantha Bertolino

Find V.C. Andrews’ Flowers in the Attic on Goodreads.

In her 1978 pitch letter, V.C. Andrews described her novel Flowers in the Attic as “basically a horror story.”  For those who haven’t read, I will try not to spoil the (in?)famous plot, which has been dragged through the press for being “deranged swill.”

That swill—or rather, family dysfunction on a biblical scale—captivated audiences worldwide. The tale of incest, poisoning, and dark family secrets sold more than forty million copies. There have been two film adaptations, a stage play, as well as sequels and prequels to the original version. 

The book inspired Amanda Palmer’s band the Dresden Dolls. Gillian Flynn, American Author, was influenced largely in her works by the characters Olivia and Corrine Foxworth, who have since become the true prototype for “wicked women.” 

In her pitch of the novel, Andrews drew from the life story of one of her doctors (alarming, I know). While discussing the details with a literary agent, Andrews’ novel was described as “awful and fabulous.” It gapes at the terror of a family’s darkest secrets, probing the stain of poison—no pun intended—which lives in their blood. 

Poster for the 2014 Lifetime adaptation of the novel pictured above. Check out a review of the miniseries by The New York Times here.

This is unsurprising, of course, given Andrews’ “wicked sense of humor.” Neiderman—the ghostwriter carrying Andrews’ mantle—studied her style closely before picking up the pen. He looked at her syntax, of course, but also observed: “She’s intrigued by why people who are supposed to love each other hurt each other so much. When you get into all the motivations, the emotions, the jealousies, the problems between mothers and daughters, fathers and sons… Whenever there’s family, there’s going to be tension. To be able to see it, visualize it, understand it, is part of what makes [her work] so powerful.”

Perhaps this is what makes her “deranged swill” so appealing. There’s a sense of absurdity, a certain quality to the book(s) that piques the interest right away. 

Neiderman put it this way: “Imagine going into a movie studio and you say to the producers, ‘I’ve got a movie here about a mother who locks her children in the attic for three years and three months.’” And then, ‘Oh yeah, there’s rape, murder and incest too!’ No one would call this a charming tale, but it’s certainly worth a read. 

Related

Blog #bookreviews#Flowers in the Attic#gothic novels#Lifetime#mystery#VC Andrewsbanned bookscontroversialhorrorReading

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Want to Contribute?

  • Get Involved
  • Submit Your Work
  • Donate
©2026 Long River Review | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes

Review My Order

0

Subtotal

Taxes & shipping calculated at checkout

Checkout
0
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notifications